Jump to Navigation

Chicago Personal Injury Law Blog

Electronic Prescriptions Can Help Reduce Prescription Errors

The problem of doctors' poor handwriting leading to indecipherable prescriptions has been around for years. If anything, the problem is getting worse, as penmanship declines everywhere in society in this digital age.

Prescription errors associated with sloppy writing lead to many unnecessary injuries and deaths. Even in an increasingly digital age, they remain a common form of medical malpractice.

Research studies are showing, however, that doctors and hospitals can reduce errors by implementing electronic prescriptions. Studies have shown, for example, that the chances of getting the prescription right increase if the doctor is able to chose the medication from a menu of options on a computer screen - and then transmit the choice electronically to a pharmacy.

But only a little more than one third of all prescriptions nationally are delivered electronically. In 2011, the rate was 36 percent, according to an e-prescription provider called Surescripts.

The cost of failing to fill prescriptions properly is huge. The Institute of Medicine estimates that the cost of adverse events caused by prescription errors is $2 billion a year.

Hospitals Gaming the System to Show Good Metrics

Concerns about the quality of care in hospitals are common among Chicago residents. For instance, it is often difficult to teach doctors to follow basic procedures when treating patients, such as using checklists or washing their hands. Failure to follow such procedures can be a form of medical malpractice.

It is not surprising that there are also issues with measuring the quality of treatment. New research shows techniques that hospitals are using to game the system and make their medical outcome statistics look better than they actually are.

For example, a report from the Journal of the American Medical Association stated that pneumonia rates dropped 27 percent over a six-year period. Researchers dug further, however, and published a new report showing that the rates dropped only because hospitals changed their diagnostic coding system to classify pneumonia as a secondary diagnosis.

One possible reason for this change is that diagnostic codes enable hospitals to bill patients at higher rates. Critics argue that this presents a conflict of interest, because medical professionals who study and propose changes to billing and coding systems stand to personally gain from changes.

Hospitals, like any other for-profit business, are managed with the principle goal of maximizing profit. Maximizing compensation through billing practices presents a shortcut to achieving this goal.

Chicago ER Errors and the Need for Interpreters

Clear communication between doctors and patients is crucial for making good decisions about medical care. The consequences of miscommunication can carry catastrophic consequences.

Chicago medical malpractice attorneys are therefore concerned about medical mistakes that can result from the lack of interpreters in hospitals. After all, Chicago is a cosmopolitan city, home to many people who do not speak English as their first language.

The problem is particularly serious in emergency rooms, where there is such an urgent need to make quick decisions. This was documented recently in a research study that was conducted at two pediatric emergency rooms in Massachusetts. It was based on families who were primarily Spanish-speaking.

The research found that medical mistakes that could have "clinical consequences" were about twice as likely to occur for non-English-speaking patients if there were no interpreters present or if the translation was done by an amateur.

Efforts Continue to Prevent Chicago Nursing Home Assaults

Problems with assault within nursing facilities are more common than most people prefer to believe.

Nursing home abuse or neglect can take many forms, of course. One is failing to properly monitor residents so that they fall - and break bones or suffer even worse damage.

Another is failing to administer needed medication properly, sometimes because of prescription errors. These errors can do grievous harm or even bring about premature death.

In terms of the sheer terror it causes nursing home residents, however, assault is in a class by itself. When a nursing home allows assaults on residents to occur - either by staff members or by other residents - it needs to be held accountable.

But in a current Chicago case, state regulators are finding that accountability can be difficult to achieve.

Two years ago, allegations surfaced of a disturbing pattern of patient-on-patient violence at the Rainbow Beach Care Center, a 200-bed facility on the South Side. It offers housing and treatment for indigent adults with mental health and disability issues.

The facility's problem with assault came to light through police reports and inspections by the state health department. Chicago police statistics indicate that there have been seven allegations involving criminal sexual assault or sexual abuse since 2008. That is more than for any other Chicago nursing home.

Infections After Surgery: More Transparency Urgently Needed

People should learn from their mistakes. Institutions should too.

So why do hospitals still have almost complete discretion on whether or not to repot infections that result from surgery? After all, such infections cost more than 8,000 people their lives in the U.S. every year.

A reporting requirement could reduce the frequency of medical malpractice and cut down on needless deaths.

It could also save the U.S. healthcare system as much as $10 billion a year.

These figures come from a new report from researchers at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The report found that fewer than half the states (21 in all) have laws that mandate monitoring of infections that follow surgery.

Of those 21 states, only eight require public disclosure of the data. And only a fraction of the types of available surgeries are included in the reporting - 10 out of a possible 250.

The collection and distribution of data on surgical infections acquired in hospitals remains highly fragmented and inconsistent across the country.

Distracted Driving Awareness Efforts Take on Cognitive Overload

We live in a very distractible society. So many portable electronic gadgets are available, and the temptation to text or go online while behind the wheel is strong.

To cut through the information overload, it's good to set aside a certain period of time to focus on the problem. Accordingly, this month, Chicago car accident lawyers and other safety advocates are recognizing national Distracted Driving Awareness Month.

The tag line for this year's events is "One Text or Call Could Wreck it All." The U.S. Department of Transportation is spearheading the awareness efforts, in collaboration with partners in all fifty states.

Many of these efforts involve education. Some people still mistakenly believe that it's okay to use a cellphone while driving. But ten states now ban not only texting while driving, but also cellphone use.

Even if someone is using his or her smartphone for GPS navigation purposes, it's still taking that person's eyes off the road and dividing their attention. And that divided attention isn't safe.

Checklists Can Help to Prevent Medical Errors and Improve Patient Outcomes

Amid all the high-tech devices involved in modern medicine, use of a simple checklist can be an important way to protect patient safety.

Chicago medical malpractice attorneys are aware that more and more evidence shows the effectiveness of checklists in preventing medical mistakes, such as surgical errors, and enhancing patient welfare.

The most recent evidence comes from a study presented last week at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in Chicago. The study involved 96 patients who were admitted to the hospital for heart problems.

At the time of discharge, researchers randomly divided the patients into two groups. The first group was given a 27-point checklist of steps to follow before they left the hospital. The other group got the normal discharge instructions.

The research found that the rates of readmission of the two groups varied greatly. After one month, only two percent of the patients whose doctors used the checklist had been readmitted. This compared to 20 percent of the other patients.

Personal Injury Blog | We have successfully represented clients throughout the state of Illinois. Subscribe to this blog's feed FindLaw Network

Call Us Today Or Email Us to Schedule an Appointment.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Office Location

Steinberg, Goodman & Kalish
20 N. Clark Street.
Chicago, IL 60602


Phone: 312-445-9084
Toll Free: 888-325-7299
Fax: 312-782-6739
Chicago Law Office

Print This Page